<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Decoding The Bible</title>
	<atom:link href="http://minstrel85.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://minstrel85.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Hidden meanings in biblical texts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:25:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on 16.Job in Jehovah’s Betting Shop by stefan</title>
		<link>http://minstrel85.wordpress.com/2008/11/26/16job-in-jehovah%e2%80%99s-betting-shop/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minstrel85.wordpress.com/?p=128#comment-86</guid>
		<description>canident: do forgive my oversight but my brain was somehow closed to Latin translation. Cave canem, as Romans used to say. Only when I looked it up again after blip, penny dropped. I think that Satan wanted Job to snarl, because he would then won the bet.But Job was clever because he let his &quot;friends&quot; to do the snarling, I think. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>canident: do forgive my oversight but my brain was somehow closed to Latin translation. Cave canem, as Romans used to say. Only when I looked it up again after blip, penny dropped. I think that Satan wanted Job to snarl, because he would then won the bet.But Job was clever because he let his &#8220;friends&#8221; to do the snarling, I think. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 16.Job in Jehovah’s Betting Shop by canisdent</title>
		<link>http://minstrel85.wordpress.com/2008/11/26/16job-in-jehovah%e2%80%99s-betting-shop/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>canisdent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minstrel85.wordpress.com/?p=128#comment-85</guid>
		<description>Why did not Job start snarling?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did not Job start snarling?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 9. Another Serpent Licks the Dust by stefan</title>
		<link>http://minstrel85.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/9-another-serpent-licks-the-dust/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 13:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minstrel85.wordpress.com/?p=95#comment-82</guid>
		<description>LaJuanaDorris: The problem with this definition is that in teh current stage of knowledge about atomic sub-particles, &quot;the smallest&quot; would be verz difficult to name: muon, hadron, pion or perhaps &quot;charm&quot; yes that might be &quot;aphar&quot; :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LaJuanaDorris: The problem with this definition is that in teh current stage of knowledge about atomic sub-particles, &#8220;the smallest&#8221; would be verz difficult to name: muon, hadron, pion or perhaps &#8220;charm&#8221; yes that might be &#8220;aphar&#8221; <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 9. Another Serpent Licks the Dust by LaJuana Dorris</title>
		<link>http://minstrel85.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/9-another-serpent-licks-the-dust/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>LaJuana Dorris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minstrel85.wordpress.com/?p=95#comment-81</guid>
		<description>I have heard another definition for aphar.  how about &quot;smallest created particle?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have heard another definition for aphar.  how about &#8220;smallest created particle?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 15. Mouth-to-Nose With a Golem by stefan</title>
		<link>http://minstrel85.wordpress.com/2008/10/27/15-mouth-to-nose-with-a-golem/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minstrel85.wordpress.com/?p=123#comment-78</guid>
		<description>andsol: that comes from studying too much such blissfully irrelevant subject as golems, gollums and Kabbala. But thank you for the compliment. Salem aleikum and shalom :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>andsol: that comes from studying too much such blissfully irrelevant subject as golems, gollums and Kabbala. But thank you for the compliment. Salem aleikum and shalom <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 15. Mouth-to-Nose With a Golem by andsol</title>
		<link>http://minstrel85.wordpress.com/2008/10/27/15-mouth-to-nose-with-a-golem/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>andsol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minstrel85.wordpress.com/?p=123#comment-77</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve got an eye for details that might be called &quot;insignificant&quot; by more hasty people...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve got an eye for details that might be called &#8220;insignificant&#8221; by more hasty people&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 13.Fishy Secrets of The Virgin by stefan</title>
		<link>http://minstrel85.wordpress.com/2008/08/26/13fishy-secrets-of-the-virgin/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minstrel85.wordpress.com/?p=110#comment-74</guid>
		<description>db: the symbol of Aquarius is a man with a pitcher of water on his shoulders. The Water-carrier. The glyph -two wavy lines -means release of solar energy from its polar opposite, Leo.My favourite astrologer Dane Rudhyar says that the sign may mean &quot;complete upheaval of State and civilization by a new type of human being and of new ideals which the existing State blindly refuses to tolerate or against which it must fight, because it cannot possibly assimilate it.&quot; It figures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>db: the symbol of Aquarius is a man with a pitcher of water on his shoulders. The Water-carrier. The glyph -two wavy lines -means release of solar energy from its polar opposite, Leo.My favourite astrologer Dane Rudhyar says that the sign may mean &#8220;complete upheaval of State and civilization by a new type of human being and of new ideals which the existing State blindly refuses to tolerate or against which it must fight, because it cannot possibly assimilate it.&#8221; It figures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 13.Fishy Secrets of The Virgin by db</title>
		<link>http://minstrel85.wordpress.com/2008/08/26/13fishy-secrets-of-the-virgin/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>db</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 01:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minstrel85.wordpress.com/?p=110#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Since the meaning of the Aquarius symbol has been said to be the pouring out of God&#039;s spirit on the earth, I think we should hope that the new &#039;religion&#039; would be Enlightened Gnosis. Or maybe that is redundant.

But nothing based on belief imposed, or even suggested, by anyone...or any one dogma. Rather based on personal awareness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the meaning of the Aquarius symbol has been said to be the pouring out of God&#8217;s spirit on the earth, I think we should hope that the new &#8216;religion&#8217; would be Enlightened Gnosis. Or maybe that is redundant.</p>
<p>But nothing based on belief imposed, or even suggested, by anyone&#8230;or any one dogma. Rather based on personal awareness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 12.Fallen Angels Falling For Women by stefan</title>
		<link>http://minstrel85.wordpress.com/2008/08/16/12fallen-angels-falling-for-women/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 09:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minstrel85.wordpress.com/?p=106#comment-67</guid>
		<description>I am sure that what you say is true,Ama, though the Fallen were experimenting with the creation of human bodies on this planet from the very beginning. I have read somewhere that all the mythical monsters in legends of various nations were the first abortive creations of the fallen angels. But how did the Fallen Ones got their physical bodies? If they had so many mistrials with human bodies, how did they manage to create their own without having at first some monstrous forms?  Swedenborg says that Nephilim were giant Egos which created much evil by using all the lowest &quot;lusts&quot; energies of the planet that were called &quot;daughters&quot;. There is still so much we don&#039;t know about our early days on earth. Many thanks for a fascinating light on the dark subject. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sure that what you say is true,Ama, though the Fallen were experimenting with the creation of human bodies on this planet from the very beginning. I have read somewhere that all the mythical monsters in legends of various nations were the first abortive creations of the fallen angels. But how did the Fallen Ones got their physical bodies? If they had so many mistrials with human bodies, how did they manage to create their own without having at first some monstrous forms?  Swedenborg says that Nephilim were giant Egos which created much evil by using all the lowest &#8220;lusts&#8221; energies of the planet that were called &#8220;daughters&#8221;. There is still so much we don&#8217;t know about our early days on earth. Many thanks for a fascinating light on the dark subject. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 12.Fallen Angels Falling For Women by Ama</title>
		<link>http://minstrel85.wordpress.com/2008/08/16/12fallen-angels-falling-for-women/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Ama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 06:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minstrel85.wordpress.com/?p=106#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Good morning or afternoon in my case,

Well it is not really suprising that humanity remembers of fallen angels with no good favour.  They are not here for the good of all, only their own ego selves, which is mostly what they are created of.  

If the fallen and women could breed their offspring would be unusual, to say the least.  I would expect giants and dwarfs and deformities of all kinds, because the fallen, in each of their 12 categories, are only one part of the energy that created humanity in the first place, so that part would be getting a double dose of DNA and spring all sorts of unusual offspring.  The human female would have to provide far more that the usual &#039;half&#039; dna that comes in the joining of human men and women.

In this case I don&#039;t think its possible.  I stand more with the theory that people from some other world might have bred with the women of earth.  I don&#039;t think we are the only beings in God&#039;s universe.  It is far too large for that.

Wishing you a good day,
Love &amp; Light
Ama</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good morning or afternoon in my case,</p>
<p>Well it is not really suprising that humanity remembers of fallen angels with no good favour.  They are not here for the good of all, only their own ego selves, which is mostly what they are created of.  </p>
<p>If the fallen and women could breed their offspring would be unusual, to say the least.  I would expect giants and dwarfs and deformities of all kinds, because the fallen, in each of their 12 categories, are only one part of the energy that created humanity in the first place, so that part would be getting a double dose of DNA and spring all sorts of unusual offspring.  The human female would have to provide far more that the usual &#8216;half&#8217; dna that comes in the joining of human men and women.</p>
<p>In this case I don&#8217;t think its possible.  I stand more with the theory that people from some other world might have bred with the women of earth.  I don&#8217;t think we are the only beings in God&#8217;s universe.  It is far too large for that.</p>
<p>Wishing you a good day,<br />
Love &amp; Light<br />
Ama</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
